Programme Information
University’s Regulations for Taught Postgraduate Curricula
Please refer to the document for details.
Regulations and Syllabuses for Arts Taught Postgraduate Curricula
Please refer to the Degree Regulations and Course Descriptions website for details.
Credit Unit Statement
Please refer to the website of Curriculum Development and Quality Assurance Section for the Credit Unit Statement of the following Taught Postgraduate curricula:
- Master of Arts in the field of AI, Ethics and Society
- Master of Arts in the field of Art History
- Master of Arts in the field of Chinese Historical Studies
- Master of Arts in the field of Chinese Language and Literature
- Master of Arts in the field of Creative Communications
- Master of Arts in the field of English Studies
- Master of Arts in the field of Hong Kong History
- Master of Arts in the field of Linguistics
- Master of Arts in the field of Literary and Cultural Studies
- Master of Arts in the field of Museum Studies
- Master of Arts in the field of Music Studies
- Master of Arts in the field of Philosophy, Politics and Economics
- Master of Arts in the field of Translation
- Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics
- Master of Buddhist Counselling
- Master of Buddhist Studies
- Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing in English
General Information
Concurrent Registration
According to the General Regulation G6, concurrent registration by a student for another post-secondary qualification either at this University or at another institution is prohibited, unless approval of the Senate has been obtained in advance. A breach of this regulation in Hong Kong or elsewhere may result in discontinuation of studies at this University. If you would like to apply for concurrent registration, please complete the application form and return it to your School/Centre office.
Assessment, Examination and Award of Distinction
University Assessment Policy
“University Assessment Policy” paper approved by the Senate (document 149/819 amended)
Faculty Policy and Protocol on Handling Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a serious academic offence. The Faculty of Arts upholds the principle that plagiarism in any form is unacceptable and any student found plagiarizing is liable to disciplinary action in addition to failing the assessment concerned. Please read the following webpages on "Definition of Plagiarism and Good Citation Practice" and "Faculty Policy and Protocol" for details.
GenAI
Grading System
Candidates shall be assessed for each of the courses for which they have registered, and assessment may be conducted in any combination of coursework and/or written examinations. Only satisfactorily completed courses will earn credits.
(a) For courses with letter grades:
Grade | Standard | Grade Point |
A+ | Excellent | 4.3 |
A | 4.0 | |
A- | 3.7 | |
B+ | Good | 3.3 |
B | 3.0 | |
B- | 2.7 | |
C+ | Satisfactory | 2.3 |
C | 2.0 | |
C- | 1.7 | |
D+ | Pass | 1.3 |
D | 1.0 | |
F | Fail | 0 |
(b) For courses graded as "Pass", "Fail" or "Distinction", they will not be included in the calculation of the GPA.
For details, please refer to the REGULATIONS FOR TAUGHT POSTGRADUATE CURRICULA (Regulation TPG 9).
Grade Expectations
Click here to view the general expectations of student performance in the Faculty of Arts.
Procedures for Checking of Assessment Results of Taught Courses
Click here for details.
Matters Related to Examinations
Please refer to the website of the Examinations Office for details.
Absence from Written Examination
22. If you are unable because of illness to be present for any paper in the examination or if you believe that your state of health either immediately before or during the examination has significantly affected your performance, you should arrange to submit a prescribed Form of Medical Certificate. You should consult a doctor on the same day of the examination concerned, and also complete Part I of the Form and give it to your doctor for completion of Part II of the Form. The completed Form, together with the original of the sick leave certificate issued by the attending doctor, should be submitted to the Examinations Office (address: Room 239B, 2/F, Main Building, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam) and must reach it within seven calendar days of the examination concerned (Please also read the note after paragraph 21). Late or incomplete submission will not be accepted.
23. If for any reason other than illness you have been unable to attend for any paper in an examination you must, within seven calendar days of the examination concerned (Please also read the note after paragraph 21), write to the Examinations Secretary at the Registry giving reasons for your absence."
Failure
Failed courses are recorded on the transcript with an F grade. Failed credits do not count toward the fulfilment of the credit requirement of the TPG curriculum. Failed grades are included in the calculation of the Semester Grade Point Average (SGPA), Year GPA (YGPA) and Cumulative GPA (CGPA) and will be taken into account when determining the award of ‘Distinction’ for the overall performance in a curriculum.
Discontinuation of Studies
Candidates whose academic performance is unsatisfactory may be recommended for discontinuation of studies according to the regulation specified for a particular curriculum. Please refer to the Regulations of your curriculum for details.
Classification of Awards
On successful completion of a curriculum, candidates who have shown exceptional merit may be awarded a mark of distinction in accordance with the curriculum regulations, where applicable. Click here for the criteria for the award of ‘Distinction’.
Research Ethics Approval for Taught Postgraduate Students
Guidelines on obtaining ethics approval of research involving human participants
As stipulated in the University’s Policy on Research Integrity, staff members and students who are the Principal Investigator (PI) of a research project involving human participants (including secondary data analysis) must refer their research protocols for review and clearance by the appropriate ethics committee of the University.
TPG students who are the PI of a research project which involves human participants in research investigations (including secondary data analysis) should apply for ethics approval, with endorsement of their supervisor, to the Programme Chairperson. The PI should make sure that such ethics approval has been obtained prior to any data collection/ analysis taking place. Failure to obtain necessary ethics approval may require recollection of data. The case may also be referred to the Chairperson of the University Research Committee for possible disciplinary action.
Please note that all research that involves collecting new data from human participants and/or using pre-existing personal data[1] is subject to ethics clearance. Collection of new data from human participants covers all forms of collection process, e.g., experimental procedures/retreatment/intervention, focus group, telephone/internet survey, observation, personal interviews, or self-administered questionnaire, etc. Usage of pre-existing data refers to retrieving readily available personal data from existing documents/records for secondary analysis, irrespective of whether or not the data are publicly available[2], whether or not the data originally collected are intentionally for research purpose, and whether the personal data from existing documents/records will be extracted for secondary analysis. For example, using students’ assignments for research analysis means to use pre-existing data from a private source that were originally collected for non-research purposes. The minimum retention period for research data and records is five years after data collection or the most recent publication related to the data, whichever is later, to ensure that there are no problems with consent, fabrication and falsification.
Application form for ethics approval (document A40/1223 amended) is available here. Copies of full research proposal including any questionnaire and/or interview script and informed consent form should be enclosed to the completed application form and submitted to the Programme Chairperson for consideration.
The PIs of all active research projects are required to report to the Programme Chairperson any amendments and new information on the project. Any deviation from the study protocol or compliance incident that has occurred during a study and may adversely affect the rights, safety or well-being of any participant or breaches of confidentiality should be reported to the Programme Chairperson within 15 calendar days from the first awareness of the deviation/incident by the PI. PIs may also be required to submit a final completion report on the request of the Programme Chairperson or the Faculty.
Application form for amendment of an approved project (document 347/413 re-amended), report form on final completion (document 348/413 amended), sample consent form, and other references on ethical principles and guidelines can be downloaded from the website of the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC).
Starting from October 1, 2021, all staff members and students (including undergraduates, taught postgraduates and research postgraduates) who are PI of a research project that involves artefacts should observe the Code of Practice for Ethical Vetting of Research Projects Involving Artefacts and obtain ethics approval from the HREC direct prior to any data collection/analysis taking place. If the research project involves both human participants and artefacts, two separate applications should be submitted to the Programme Chairperson and the HREC respectively. Please also refer to the HREC website for details.
Application Form for Ethics Approval (For TPG students in Faculty of Arts)
[1] As defined by the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, “personal data” means any data (a) relating directly or indirectly to a living individual; and (b) from which it is practicable for the identity of the individual to be directly or indirectly ascertained; and (c) in a form in which access to or processing of the data is practicable.
[2] “Publicly available” means that the general public can obtain the data. Sources are not considered “publicly available” if access to the data is limited to researchers.
Ethics Approval for Research Projects Involving Artefacts
The University sets up new ethics approval requirement and procedures for research projects involving artefacts with effect from October 1, 2021. All staff members and students (including undergraduates, taught postgraduates and research postgraduates) who are PI of a research project that involves artefacts should observe the “Code of Practice for Ethical Vetting of Research Projects Involving Artefacts” and obtain ethics approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee direct prior to any data collection/analysis taking place.
Lodging of Dissertation in University Libraries
Upon Chief Examiner’s recommendation, selected candidates will be asked to provide soft copy and hard copy of the dissertation for lodging in the University Libraries and retention by the programme committee respectively.
Prizes
The following prizes will be awarded to candidates with outstanding academic performance in a curriculum upon nomination by the programme.
Master of Arts in the field of Art History
- MAAH Outstanding Performance Scholarship
Master of Arts in the field of Chinese Historical Studies
- HKU MACHS Alumni Prize for MA in Chinese Historical Studies
- MA in Chinese Historical Studies Prize
Master of Arts in the field of Chinese Language and Literature
- MA in Chinese Language and Literature Prize
- MA in Chinese Language and Literature Prize in Capstone Experience
- MA in Chinese Language and Literature Scholarship
Master of Arts in the field of Literary and Cultural Studies
- Esther MK Cheung Memorial Prize for Postgraduate Students
Master of Arts in the field of Translation
- MA in Translation Prize
Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics
- Peter Cheung Memorial Prize
Master of Buddhist Counselling
- MaMa Charitable Foundation Award for Excellence in Buddhist Counselling
Master of Buddhist Studies
- Khyentse Foundation Award for Excellence in Buddhist Studies
- Master Shing Yi Award for Excellence in Buddhist Studies
University's Quality Manual
Please refer to the Quality Manual website for details.
Writing Enhancement for Taught Postgraduate Students
One-on-one tutoring sessions
- Formulating an argument
- Outlining
- Strategies for writing
- Feedback on outline and drafts
- Revision and editing
- English enhancement
- Academic integrity
- Ethical use of AI for writing enhancement
Booking Procedures
- Read Before Booking:
- If you have a draft or outline that you would like to discuss, send it to Nicole at Lvaughan@connect.hku.hk at least 48 hours in advance.
- Nicole does not read full essays. She will read a few pages to identify recurring issues and patterns in the writing to discuss strategies for improvement.
- Nicole is not a subject matter specialist in most of your fields. She will provide feedback on writing-related issues.
- Cancellation
- If you can no longer attend a scheduled meeting, you must cancel via Calendly at least 24 hours prior to the meeting start time.
- Late Cancellation/No-Show
- If you cancel late or fail to show up, you will be ineligible to book Writing Enhancement meetings for 4 weeks.
- Exceptions will be made in cases of emergency. Please email Nicole if you would like her to make an exception.
- Meeting Limits
- Please do not schedule more than 5 Writing Enhancement meetings per semester.
- Formulating a thesis statement
- Essay structure and signposting
- Literature review and engaging with sources
- Abstract and conclusion writing
- Plagiarism and academic integrity
- Ethical use of AI for writing enhancement
If there are any ways Nicole can support writing enhancement in your programme, please get in touch at Lvaughan@connect.hku.hk.
Useful Forms
Academic Support and Examinations Section, the Registry, HKU processes applications of the following:
- Transcript (current students can also submit an application via SIS)
- Testimonial
- Certification
- Certificate of Graduation
- Replacement of Graduation Certificates